PLNA Government Relations Committee Won’t Support Fertilizer Bill
Wednesday, June 29, 2016
(3 Comments)
Posted by: Gregg Robertson
HARRISBURG – Last week, the PLNA Government Relations Committee decided not to support a bill that would regulate fertilizer on which it had been working with PDA for the past year and a half.
PLNA concluded that PDA had done a good job of drafting a program that would cause the least disruption and cost to the green industry. However, when PDA submitted the bill to EPA for review, EPA concluded that the bill did not provide sufficient environmental benefit to give Pennsylvania credit toward meeting its Chesapeake Bay goals.
Pennsylvania has been under pressure from EPA to reduce loadings of nitrogen, phosphorus and sediment into the Susquehanna River and eventually the Chesapeake Bay.
The Government Relations Committee concluded that if the bill provided no environmental benefits and Pennsylvania would get no offsetting credit from EPA, there was no sense in imposing the program’s additional costs on the industry.
PLNA’s goal was to have the new fertilizer program integrated as closely as possible with the existing pesticide certification program so as to cause minimal impact and cost on companies in the lawn care business. PLNA thinks that PDA has done a good job of doing that in this latest draft.
The draft legislation would do several things:
- Require all businesses that apply fertilizer for hire to pay an annual fee of $100, register and have at least one employee on staff who is certified by PDA to apply fertilizer.
- Require any person who applies fertilizer for hire to be certified by PDA (much as pesticide applicators are certified by PDA) after passing a written exam.
- The exam to become a certified fertilizer applicator will be a part of the current pesticide certification program as a separate category.
- Keep records regarding the application of fertilizer to a property, including the time, amounts and rates of application.
- Allow certified applicators to train fertilizer applicator technicians who could apply fertilizers under indirect offsite supervision. Those not certified could apply fertilizer only under the direct on-site supervision of a certified applicator.
- Allow for those currently holding pesticide applicator certification to be grandfathered into the fertilizer program as a certified applicator for the period that their current pesticide certification is in effect.
- Application rates for fertilizers would be set by PDA in consultation with Penn State.
- Preempt local governments from enacting ordinances that would regulate the application of fertilizers.
The draft legislation has not yet been introduced in the General Assembly.
You can review a copy of the latest version of the draft legislation by clicking here. If you have any comments, please contact Gregg Robertson at PLNA via email or call 717.238.2033.
|